The Swedish government discovered itself in the unexpected scenario of paying a convicted – and subsequently imprisoned – drug seller round $ 1.5 million in Bitcoin (BTC).

Two years in the past, this man was convicted in a Swedish courtroom for illegally buying 36 bitcoins by on-line drug gross sales. However, Tove Kullberg, his then prosecutor, used the equal of Bitcoin in fiat to signify her case. As a consequence, the courtroom dominated that the person must be disadvantaged of his illegally earned bitcoins, which had been then price 1.3 million Swedish kronor (US $ 100,000).

In the aftermath of the person’s conviction and imprisonment, his cryptocurrency retailer grew to such an extent that the Swedish legislation enforcement company tasked with auctioning 36 BTC solely wants to promote 3 BTC to adjust to the courtroom’s request.

That leaves 33 BTC price $ 1.5 million that have to be legally returned to its proprietor. Speaking to Swedish radio, Kullberg stated the way in which she argued her case was, in retrospect, “unfortunate in many ways”. […] That led to penalties that I could not foresee on the time. “

“The lesson from this, to maintain the worth of bitcoin, is that the revenue from committing a criminal offense must be 36 bitcoins, whatever the worth of bitcoin at that time in time.”

Kullberg additionally harassed that prosecutors will probably be effectively invested in coaching their workforce on the small print of the business as cryptocurrencies are extra frequent than ever. “The more we increase understanding in the organization, the less likely we are to make mistakes,” she says.

Relatives: Is it authorized property in spite of everything? Governments acquire money from seized cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies – whether or not due to their volatility or their technical design – proceed to problem regulators and procedures all over the world. In the UK, a government-approved job drive just lately proposed a dispute settlement framework that will assist standardize dispute settlement procedures for sensible contracts. By not recognizing or representing Bitcoin as authorized tender, a Russian courtroom dominated final 12 months in opposition to the resale of stolen cryptocurrency to victims of a severe crime.